Comments on: “Gay Terrorists”

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:47:55 +0000

By the way, “Anonymous”, by your logic the following websites and their proprietors are guily of calling for the death of the President of the United Stated , amongst others – a crime, I “felony.”

http://www.motherearth.org/bushwanted/wanted.php
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/07/293231.shtml
http://www.gamersnook.com/blog/hopeisfled/002511.html
http://www.tom-davis.org/bush-must-go/main.html

Oh hell, why not the entire administration and a the GOP itself.

http://www.internetweekly.org/iwr/cartoons/cartoon_gop_playing_cards.html

Take your pick. But if you are going to accuse me of advocating violence, which I clearly do not, then you are also accusing those that run the sites I listed.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:31:53 +0000

Really? I was provided notice? By whom? As for whether I want peaceful discourse, I could not have been any clearer in the post AND in the graphic – the graphic specifically says to email Rogers. I do not call for or endorse any other action than emaling Rogers to voice displeasure.

By: Mike Rogers

Mike Rogers — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:25:49 +0000

Interesting concept, but as I undertstand it, you were provided notice that your graphic is constued by many as a call to violence, exactly the same as the site was held responsible for Slepian’s murder. You claim you want peaceful discourse, your actions prove otherwise.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:12:00 +0000

Of course it would not be a good thing for me or anyone else – thus the call to keep peaceful discourse in mind.

By: Mike Rogers

Mike Rogers — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:58:00 +0000

Finding out your number is easy. You entered it into the database when you signed up on the web. you can see your post here. http://www.whois.sc/limeshurbet.com

Great items, but your banner ad is over the top. It might motivate someone to take more violent action than you hope for. If your website motivated someone’s murder, would it be a good thing for you?

By: Robert

Robert — Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:47:51 +0000

Thanks for the kind words Lorraine. I don’t know exactly what is going on here, but next week is going to be interesting. I fully intend to continue asking questions – starting with the two subjects of the post GP made.

in the meantime, I know it is a long-shot, but if anyone has a copy of the original post by GP, please email it to me. rds007@hotmail.com.

By: GP fan

GP fan — Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:47:06 +0000

Keep digging. There is a story here. That’s all I can say for now. But you are right to make the connections you have been so far….

By: Lorraine

Lorraine — Sun, 27 Mar 2005 03:32:58 +0000

That’s sad that ANY site has to close for that reason. I read GP before, and I have a hard time believing that anyone in the group would really want violent action against the two.

It’s sad to see another blogger go like that- and what’s worse, another gay conservative blogger. I believe that they are truly precious in the sense that they are very hard to find. The loony left is working at convincing many homosexuals that the all conservatives hate them and condemn them all to hell.

All of the gays I know are liberals! It would be nice to meet a conservative one someday. And yet another reason you gotta love Lime Shurbet!

I’m digressing so bad that it isn’t even funny.

But anyway. ‘Tis sad. Having to say that you don’t advocate violence is pretty sad- where would anyone get an idea that GP would advocate anything like that? Or any clear-minded blog, for that matter?

By: R Cane

R Cane — Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:56:53 +0000

I think not… his new post offers some light. I think some mistook his post for a call for violent action. It was a call for action but I don’t think violence was ever his intent.

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:46:01 +0000

Well, where there is smoke, there is usually fire. It all seems way to coincidental to me. Hopefully it is nothing nefarious.